NAME Committee on Forensic Pathology Training: Recommendations |
|
The Committee on Forensic Pathology Training has completed its efforts to prepare guidelines for forensic pathology training programs. Our committee initially surveyed the NAME membership and the 42 current FP training programs, in order to attempt to delineate more clearly the areas of FP training that must be addressed. We then reviewed the ACGME/RRC guidelines and program information forms which are used during accreditation proceedings. At the last NAME meeting, we presented our recommendations at the business meeting. Our next goal is to publish the recommendations. Prior to this, we have attempted to contact as many training programs as possible for final comment. Finally, we are posting the guidelines on the NAME website for general membership review and comment. Please direct all comments to Joe Prahlow. The following updated recommendations are divided into several categories. First, a general synopsis of the current RRC requirements and program information forms, with suggestions to the ACGME/RRC to make them more appropriate. Second, we list items we feel the ACGME/RRC should REQUIRE of all FP training programs. Third, we list items we feel the ACGME/RRC should RECOMMEND in all FP training programs. 1 – General Synopsis of Current RRC Training Requirements and Program Information Forms: The current ACGME Program Requirements for Residency Education in Forensic Pathology list several specific requirements and/or recommendations within part III (Educational Program) that are not specifically addressed in the Program Information Form used by the RRC during the accreditation process. For example, the requirements state that trainees should perform 250 to 350 autopsies during their training year, yet, in the Program Information Form, there is no question specifically asking how many autopsies the fellows perform. As such, we would like to recommend to the ACGME that the forms be re-evaluated and revised in order that they address the same topics. Another area of concern is that the minimum autopsy number requirement is apparently not "enforced." Almost half of all FP training programs reported in the survey that their fellows perform fewer than 250 autopsies. If the 250 minimum is a recommendation rather than a requirement, it should be stated as such. The current ACGME guidelines may be viewed under the heading, "Program Requirements for Residency in Forensic Pathology" at the ACGME website 2 – Requirements (ACGME/RRC): The following is a list of items we feel the ACGME/RRC should require of all FP training programs. These should be listed in part III (Educational Program) as described above, and they should be specifically addressed in a revised Program Information Form. Please note that we feel strongly that the following items should be requirements, not just recommendations. Also please note that these suggestions would replace the current requirements in part III of the ACGME Program Requirements for Residency Education in Forensic Pathology guidelines:
|
|
2 – Recommendations: The following is a list of items we feel the ACGME/RRC should list as "highly-desirable" recommendations (but NOT required) for FP training programs. Failure to implement any of these items would NOT result in a penalty:
|
| email: Wrongful Death & injury Institute |
|
Copyright © 2008 Karen L. Russo - The Wrongful Death Institute & Forensic Science Associates. All Rights Reserved. These articles or pages may not be copied, transmitted, forwarded, reposted, or republished, in whole or in part, electronically or in any other format, without express written permission. This is not a solicitation for legal business. The Institute is not engaged in the practice of law. Mere contact through this website does not constitute a contract for representation. Wrongful Death Institute pages are designed and maintained by Four Boys Inc. |